protoncek je napisal/a: |
Roko na srce, v momentu, ko si šel na ebaj iskat FTDI čipe, si VEDEL (no, vsaj moral bi!), da iščeš fake zadeve, sicer bi šel v IC ali HTE. |
int47 je napisal/a: |
@Protonček: Prodajna cena in proizvodni stroški danes večinoma niso neposredno povezani. |
Citiram: |
Moji driverji s to plato ne rabijo delat. Pika.
|
Citiram: |
Unfortunately, current update of FTDI drivers in windows made things much worse: software-compatible chips abusing "FTDI" marking are now silently bricked by FTDI drivers by resetting their PID. |
Citiram: |
In our original conversation with FTDI representatives back in February we suggested that making chips send 0's is a bad solution because it causes a lot of debugging headache for lots of people and that we feel the most adequate solution would have been to have drivers send "FAKECHIP" string. |
Citiram: |
The coding exploits differences found in the silicon of counterfeit chips compared to the legit ones. In the small snippet of code decompiled by [marcan], the FTDI driver does nothing for legit chips, but writes 0 and value to make the EEPROM checksum match to counterfeit chips. It’s an extremely clever bit of code, but also clear evidence FTDI is intentionally bricking counterfeit devices. |
Citiram: |
Dejstvo je, da se fake čip predstavi kot da je originalen. Če bi se fake čip predstavil drugače, bi bilo pa vse skupaj res močno sporno.
Dejstvo je, da driver ne more vnaprej vedeti, kateri čip je fake in kateri original. |
BluPhenix je napisal/a: | ||
Tako da VolkD:
Dejstvo je, da driver vnaprej ve kateri čip je fake in kateri originalen in je res močno sporno. Zato je po zadnjih poročanjih FTDI naredil korak nazaj. |